Instruments of Social Policy of the Eurasian Economic Union (Part 2)

Инструменты социальной политики Евразийского экономического союза (часть 2)

Rubtsov, Gennady (Рубцов, Геннадий) and Misko, Oleg (Мисько, Олег) ()
Additional contact information
Rubtsov, Gennady (Рубцов, Геннадий): Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Misko, Oleg (Мисько, Олег): Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics, 2023, issue 3, 64-78

Abstract: Aim. Taking into account the above, the purpose of the study was to analyze the patterns of development of the social policy of the Russian Federation, the republics of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia, to consider their weaknesses and points of growth in order to identify the potential for strengthening integration ties based on the unification of social development tools. Task. To analyze various areas of social life of the EAEU member countries, identify similarities in development trends in order to create a basis for the formation of unified socio-economic transformations. To demonstrate social tools for the development of «transinstitutional interaction» within the boundaries of the Eurasian Economic Union. Methods. The following methods were used i n the article: comparative an alysis — to compare the effectiveness of social policy instruments in the EAEU countries. The novelty lies in the improvement of the integration processes of the Eurasian integration countries with the help of the proposed author’s approach to unify the social policies of the EAEU member countries on the basis of “transinstitutional cooperation”. Results. A comprehensive analysis of social policy instruments (migration, youth, labor, housing, etc.) of all participants in the Eurasian integration was carried out. Recommendations are proposed for improving social tools within the framework of “transinstitutional cooperation” of the EAEU states. Conclusion. The analysis of the instruments of social policy laid down the priorities in the development of the mechanisms of “transinstitutional cooperation” by the members of the EAEU, expressed in the author’s recommendations in this study. The Republics of Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Kazakhstan should focus on developing a unified strategy for youth and migration policies. The Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus should focus on population aging, providing older citizens with pension savings, and encouraging the development of family and motherhood institutions. This is disclosed in more detail in separate blocks of the study devoted to specific areas of social development of the EAEU countries.

Keywords: social policy; EAEU; Eurasian Union; institutional cooperation; welfare state; youth policy; migration policy; pension; pension system; migration; union state (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/eurint/et2305.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:eurint:et2305

Access Statistics for this article

Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics is currently edited by Sergey Glazyev

More articles in Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().