FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF RUSSIAN REGIONS IN THE SYSTEM OF ECONOMIC FEDERATIVE RELATIONS
ФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ СТАТУС РЕГИОНОВ РОССИИ В СИСТЕМЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ ФЕДЕРАТИВНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ
Korotina, Natalya (Коротина, Наталья) ()
Additional contact information
Korotina, Natalya (Коротина, Наталья): The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, 2022, 47-61
Abstract:
Introduction. The article deals with the problem of the functional status of regions in the system of economic federalism, which is associated with the high spatial heterogeneity of Russia, and explains the need to move from the model of economic federalism, which combines the presence of universal institutions and institutional exceptions, to a model that takes into account the spatial diversity of territories. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the decrease in the heterogeneity of the economic federalism space when moving on to a model based on macro territories - groups of regions with the same functional status. Methods. The author uses methods of a monographic review, logical and statistical analysis in the context of applying a spatial approach in studying the relations of economic federalism, as well as the concept of “smart specialization” in relation to the regions of Russia to differentiate the relationship of the federal center with the territories within the same specialization. Scientific novelty of the study. The article is the first to present a methodology for determining the functional status of regions, which is the basis for the subsequent formation of a model of relations between the federal center and macro regions. Results. The author proposes methods for determining the functional status of regions and calculating indicators that characterize the relations of economic federalism. The first methodology, based on economic and territorial criteria, makes it possible to attribute each region of Russia to a group of macro regions according to their functional status. The second method makes it possible to substantiate a greater asymmetry of indicators characterizing economic federalism in the country as a whole than in the context of macro territories. Conclusions. Regarding the higher stability of indicators characterizing economic federalism by groups of macro-territories than in the country as a whole, the need for a transition to a flexible model of economic federalism based on differentiated measures and specific tools to support regions in the context of their functional specializations is substantiated.
Keywords: economic federalism; space of economic federalism; functional status of the region; functional specialization; smart specialization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp2205.pdf
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:spower:sp2205
Access Statistics for this article
Sotsium i vlast / Society and power is currently edited by Sergey Zyryanov
More articles in Sotsium i vlast / Society and power from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().