MORALITY IN POLITICS: ZHAO TINGYANG’S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

МОРАЛЬ В ПОЛИТИКЕ: ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ ЧЖАО ТИНЯНА

Zhang, Shuchun (Чжанг, Шучунь) ()
Additional contact information
Zhang, Shuchun (Чжанг, Шучунь): Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, 2022, 37-45

Abstract: Introduction. The article aims at presenting the system proposed by the modern Chinese philosopher Zhao Tingyang towards political realities. Scientific novelty. Due to the lack of translations of Zhao’s works into Russian, Russian science has extremely limited understanding of his theory and the modern Chinese philosophy in general. The article is one of the first attempts to present Zhao’s main thoughts on political philosophy in Russian on the basis of original texts. Results. Following the ancient Chinese theorists, Zhao regards the need to cooperate as the reason of the beginning of politics and suggests studying the world based on a broader scale “Tianxia” (‘All under Heaven’). Zhao’s theory of the initial form of politics called the “Xunzi-Hobbes Hypothesis” combines Hobbes’ idea about individual conflicts and the principle of coexistence which is typical for Eastern philosophy. According to Zhao, “Tianxia” as an ideal political regime is also set as the starting point of the political templation (Tianxia > State > Family > Individual). While criticising Confucianism for its impracticality in solving political issues, Zhao suggests that the only regime where its members prefer morality is when it is a prerequisite for obtaining greater benefits. Conclusions. Zhao’s political philosophy offers a pragmatic approach to deal with the ethical issues in politics. We concluded that in the ideal regime proposed by Zhao, morality functions rather as a tool to achieve more benefits and ceases to be a universal law. A comparative analysis led to the conclusion that his approach to morality in politics is comparable to that of N. Machiavelli, for whom the practical significance of any means can dominate abstract values.

Keywords: Chinese philosophy; political philosophy; morality; politics; regime; tian-xia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp2223.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:spower:sp2223

Access Statistics for this article

Sotsium i vlast / Society and power is currently edited by Sergey Zyryanov

More articles in Sotsium i vlast / Society and power from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().