STRATEGIC PLANNING IN TWO BORDER REGIONS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC – COMPARISON OF PROJECT IMPACT IN ZLÍN AND SOUTH BOHEMIA REGIONS
Gabriela Antošová (),
Vladimíra Šilhánková () and
René Wokoun ()
Additional contact information
Gabriela Antošová: Department of Regional Development, College of Regional Development, Prague, Czech Republic
Vladimíra Šilhánková: Department of Regional Development, College of Regional Development, Prague, Czech Republic
René Wokoun: Department of Regional Development, College of Regional Development, Prague, Czech Republic
REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, 2017, vol. 2017, issue 29, 128-140
Abstract:
One of the methods of effective management is the use of strategic planning that represents a very important tool for development of regions. An integral part of strategic planning is to create individual projects through which strategic objectives are subsequently carried out. The objective of the paper was to examine perception of local population related to the impact of development projects in two selected regions in the Czech Republic (Zlín and South Bohemia Region). The researched projects, implemented in the programming period of 2007-2013, focused on impacts of the projects from Regional Operational Programs with special emphasis on tourism. In terms of an overall impact, it is possible to state that in both researched regions the greatest impacts were perceived to be those that accomplish purpose and brought something new, followed by met expectations of residents and not so much behind those projects that had an impact on improve equipment.
Keywords: strategic planning; municipality; development project; perception; Czech Republic. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R51 R53 R58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2017/29-08.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2017:y:2017:i:29:p:128-140
Access Statistics for this article
REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC is currently edited by Androniceanu Armenia
More articles in REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC from Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Androniceanu Armenia ().