Progetto euro: cosa è andato storto? La riforma necessaria dell’Eurozona
PierGiorgio Gawronski ()
Additional contact information
PierGiorgio Gawronski: Scuola Nazionale dell’Amministrazione, Roma
Rivista di Politica Economica, 2014, issue 1, 95-182
The article offers an overview of the literature on the many institutional weaknesses of the Eurozone exposed in the 2009-2013 period. Comparing failures with expected outcomes clarifies where the original project has gone wrong. Three main conclusions are offered. a) The Eurozone is even less a viable currency area than it was believed; the theory of Optimal Currency Areas underestimates the costs and overestimates the benefits of the euro; (b) Asymmetric shocks are stronger than expected; (c) Institutions are biased, ill-suited for managing even symmetric negative demand shocks. A comprehensive institutional reform would be the most appropriate response.
Keywords: ECB; Eurozone (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E58 E61 F33 H60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rpo:ripoec:y:2014:i:1:p:95-182
Access Statistics for this article
Rivista di Politica Economica is currently edited by Gustavo Piga
More articles in Rivista di Politica Economica from SIPI Spa
Series data maintained by Sabrina Marino ().