Extreme value theory, asset ranking and threshold choice: a practical note on VaR estimation

Benjamin R. Auer

Journal of Risk

Abstract: ABSTRACT We analyze asset rankings derived from state-of-the-art peak-over-threshold (POT) approaches to estimate value-at-risk (VaR). Supported by a variety of robustness checks, we gain three important insights for portfolio managers investing in equity and commodity markets. First, even though POT methods are known to yield more precise VaR estimates than classic techniques based on the normal distribution assumption or historical simulation, all techniques yield almost identical rankings. Second, even though the choice of threshold crucially influences VaR estimates, it does not significantly change asset rankings. These two results are most pronounced when the portfolio manager's focus is on identifying the best or worst assets in terms of VaR. Third, unconditional and conditional POT approaches differ considerably in the rankings they generate. Thus, neglecting the non-independent-and-identically-distributed property of returns can lead to distinctly different decisions in a risk-based asset selection process. Please click here to download PDF

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/2428929/extre ... te-on-var-estimation (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsk:journ4:2428929

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk from Journal of Risk
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Paine ().