Relative performance persistence of financial forecasting models and its economic implications

Thorsten Poddig, Eduard Baitinger and Christian Fieberg

Journal of Risk

Abstract: ABSTRACT This paper addresses the issue of model selection risk by examining whether a model's past performance in forecasting expected returns provides an indication of its future forecasting performance. For this purpose, we implement a wide range of different forecasting models and then apply the Aiolfi-Timmermann methodology for relative;performance persistence measurement. We find no evidence of performance persistence in forecasting models at the top end of the historical forecasting performance rankings. Economic consequences of this purely statistical study are subsequently quantified by an out-of-sample asset allocation exercise. Simulating an asset allocator, who selects ex ante return forecasting models based on their ex post performance,;we show that investors should make portfolio decisions based on forecasting models from the middle of the historical forecasting performance rankings. ;

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/2463259/relat ... conomic-implications (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsk:journ4:2463259

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk from Journal of Risk
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Paine ().