EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Nonparametric versus parametric expected shortfall

R. Douglas Martin and Shengyu Zhang

Journal of Risk

Abstract: We use influence functions as a basic tool to study unconditional nonparametric and parametric expected shortfall (ES) estimators with regard to returns data influence, standard errors and coherence. Nonparametric ES estimators have a monotonically decreasing influence function of returns. ES maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) influence functions are nonmonotonic and approximately symmetric, resulting in large positive returns contributing to risk. However, ES MLEs have the lowest possible asymptotic variance among consistent ES estimators. Influence functions are used to derive large sample standard error formulas for both types of ES estimator for normal and t -distributions as well as to evaluate nonparametric ES estimator inefficiency. Monte Carlo results determine finite sample sizes for which the standard errors of both types of ES estimators are sufficiently accurate to be used in practice. The nonmonotonicity of ES MLEs leads us to study a modification of normal distribution MLEs in which standard deviation is replaced by semi-standard deviation (SSD). Influence function theory is used to establish a condition under which an SSD-based ES risk estimator has monotonic influence functions and the underlying risk measures are coherent. It is also shown that the SSD-based estimator’s asymptotic standard error is only slightly larger than that of the standard deviation-based estimator.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/6922266/nonpa ... c-expected-shortfall (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsk:journ4:6922266

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk from Journal of Risk
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Paine ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:6922266