The utility of Basel III rules on excessive violations of internal risk models

Wayne Tarrant

Journal of Risk Model Validation

Abstract: The Basel III international regulatory framework for banks calls for the adoption of historical empirical distributions should a bank’s internal models fail in a significant way. If the historical distribution is the fallback to an internal model, it is important to know if the empirical distribution gives a better view of future reality. In this paper, we look at the efficacy of risk measures on energy markets and across several different stock market indexes. We calculate both the value-at-risk (VaR) and the expected shortfall (ES) on each of these data sets as well as on selected portfolios of these assets. We consider several different durations and levels for the historical risk measures, looking at the number of violations that Basel III measures for its requirements. We also calculate different error measurements for the VaR and ES. Using our results, we make some recommendations concerning the Basel III framework. The computations here strongly indicate that the Bank for International Settlements should adopt harsher guidelines than are presently in place. Further, we would offer firms the option of using internal models and reporting multiple risk measures or using historical empirical measures and only reporting a single measure.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validat ... internal-risk-models (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsk:journ5:6409336

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk Model Validation from Journal of Risk Model Validation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Paine (maintainer@infopro-digital.com).