Bayesian Method with Clustering Algorithm for Credit Card Transaction Fraud Detection

Luis Jose S. Santos and Shirlee R. Ocampo
Additional contact information
Luis Jose S. Santos: De La Salle University, Philippines
Shirlee R. Ocampo: De La Salle University, Philippines

Romanian Statistical Review, 2018, vol. 66, issue 1, 103-120

Abstract: Card transaction fraud is prevalent anywhere. Even with current preventive measures like the Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) chips, possible weaknesses or loopholes can be exploited by fraudsters. This paper explores Naive Bayes Classifier and clustering algorithms to detect fraud in credit card transactions. Data on fraud labels and arrival times of transactions were simulated by the Markov Modulated Poisson Process. Amounts of transactions for genuine and fraud transactions were simulated based on two Gaussian distributions. Kinds of spenders and types of fraudsters serve as the bases for the parameters used in the simulation of the data. Using the simulated data, EM clustering algorithm with three different initializations and K-means were applied to cluster transaction amounts into high, medium and low. The Naive Bayes classifier algorithm was then applied to classify the transactions as good or fraud for the simulated data of 9 types of fraudsters across all clustering algorithms. Simulations and analyses were done using R software. Results include comparisons of true positive rates, false positive rates, and detection accuracies among the nine types of fraudsters across all clustering algorithms. For 3 clusters, (high, medium, low transaction amounts), the Naive Bayes Method with clustering algorithms resulted to an average of 76% true positive (TP) detection, 18% false positive (FP) detection, with an overall accuracy of 81%. The same averages of TP, FP, and overall accuracy were obtained using 2 clusters (high, and low). EM clustering algorithm generated TP, FP, and overall accuracy of 80%, 16%, and 83% respectively.

Keywords: credit card transaction; fraud detection; Naive Bayes Classifier; clustering algorithms; Markov Modulated Poisson Process data simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C11 C39 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/RRS_1_2018_A08.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsr:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:1:p:103-120

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Romanian Statistical Review from Romanian Statistical Review Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Adrian Visoiu ().