Beyond the ‘Approach in Terms of Régulation’?

Bob Jessop and Ngai-Ling Sum

Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, 2016, vol. 19

Abstract: This article is our response to suggestions from well-placed insiders at the 2015 Régulation Conference who were not present at the foundation and who have made several suggestions on how to overcome critical deficits in regulationist analyses (see Chanteau et al., this issue). As informed outsiders, we welcome this opportunity to revisit the approach in terms of régulation (ATR) and consider its strengths and weaknesses from our perspective. So we offer five sets of reflections on the ATR an...

Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://regulation.revues.org/11927 (text/html)
http://regulation.revues.org/pdf/11927 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rvr:journl:2016:11927

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs from Association Recherche et Régulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pascal Seppecher ().