Simple Pigovian Taxes VS. Emission Fees to Control Negative Externalities: A Pedagogical Note

Robert S. Main

The American Economist, 2010, vol. 55, issue 2, 104-110

Abstract: Many economics texts introduce their analysis of negative externalities by examining a tax on the output of polluting firms, sometimes called a “simple Pigovian tax,†often pointing out that taxing pollution directly is superior to taxing output and proceeding to discuss an emission fee as an alternative. They do not show how and why an emission fee is more efficient than an output tax. This note presents a numerical example allowing comparison of the welfare effects of the two approaches, as well as showing why simply reducing the pollution intensity of polluters' output would be inferior to an emission fee.

Keywords: Simple Pigovian tax; Emission fee; Pollution; Efficiency; Command and control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/056943451005500211 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:amerec:v:55:y:2010:i:2:p:104-110

DOI: 10.1177/056943451005500211

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The American Economist from Sage Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().