The Accuracy, Market Ethic, and Individual Morality Surrounding the Profit Maximization Assumption
The American Economist, 2013, vol. 58, issue 2, 111-123
This paper hinges on the distinction between â€œmaximizing profitâ€ and â€œmaking profit.â€ It recounts from Adam Smith the ethical basis for profit making, and observes in Augustin Cournot why the maximization assumption was introduced. Several introductory texts are examined to observe how profit maximization is presented. The veracity of the assumption is challenged by considering: owner/ managers who focus on utility rather than profit, corporate maximization of shareholder wealth, corporate managers who pursue personal benefits, and evidence of â€œcorporate social responsibility.â€ Milton Friedman's 1970 New York Times Magazine essay, â€œThe Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profitsâ€ is used to support that the ethical justification for the market system does not rest on maximizing profit, and that individuals often have moral latitude to pursue non-pecuniary business goals alongside seeking profit. Teaching that all firms maximize profit poorly educates students concerning how many firms actually behave and it reinforces a pecuniary value.
Keywords: profit maximization; introductory economics; corporate social responsibility; Adam Smith (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:amerec:v:58:y:2013:i:2:p:111-123
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The American Economist from Sage Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().