The Distributional Efficacy of Collaborative Learning on Student Outcomes
Kim Huynh (),
David T. Jacho-ChÃ¡vez and
James Self ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: David Tomás Jacho-Chávez ()
The American Economist, 2015, vol. 60, issue 2, 98-119
This study addresses self-selection and heterogeneity issues inherent in measuring the efficacy of voluntary training programs. We exploit data collected from Indiana University's introductory microeconomics course. In conjunction with their class, undergraduates were given the choice to participate in a voluntary training program called Collaborative Learning (CL), which is designed to encourage a self-discovery learning style. To address self-selection and heterogeneity in the effectiveness of CL, program evaluation methods were used to measure student performance. We find, amongst other things, that CL produces heterogeneous results e.g., the bottom 40 percentile of CL participants improved their performance the most, and that students at the higher end of the grade distribution achieve greater improvement in topic understanding. The latter is greater than can be associated with superior innate ability alone. Finally, parametric and non-parametric sensitivity analysis confirmed that the sign of the calculated treatment effects is robust to potential violations of the underlying assumptions.
Keywords: voluntary training; quantile treatment effects; program evaluation; learning styles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:amerec:v:60:y:2015:i:2:p:98-119
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The American Economist from Sage Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().