Teaching and Learning Alternatives to a Comparative Advantage Motivation for Trade
James Self () and
William Becker ()
The American Economist, 2016, vol. 61, issue 2, 178-190
Introductory economics courses emphasize opportunity cost, comparative advantage, and specialization to show the benefits of trade. We assert that this emphasis leads to erroneous student mind-set that trade requires specialization based on comparative advantage. We test students who have been exposed to the typical textbook and classroom presentation of specialization and trade with real but paradoxical situations where the same goods are both imported and exported by a country. Students are found to generally understand comparative advantage calculations but wrongfully apply the idea to this multiproduct trade situation for which specialization is not relevant.
Keywords: comparative advantage; specialization; trade; introductory economics textbooks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Teaching and Learning Alternatives to a Comparative Advantage Motivation for Trade (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:amerec:v:61:y:2016:i:2:p:178-190
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The American Economist from Sage Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().