Handing Off: Frontline Redistribution of Work
Elizabeth Chiarello,
Kelley Fong and
Josh Seim
American Sociological Review, 2026, vol. 91, issue 4, 651-673
Abstract:
In the governance of poverty and marginality, a complex array of frontline workers manages social suffering. Enabled and constrained by vertical and horizontal relations of production, these workers frequently redistribute work across organizational boundaries. Recent scholarship often reduces such redistribution to a single dynamic: “burden shuffling.†This study extends and complicates that framework. Drawing on three case studies—ambulance crews, mandated reporters of child maltreatment, and physicians treating chronic pain—we theorize how frontline workers’ practical and moral judgments structure the form and justification of redistribution. Variation in the extent to which workers feel equipped and see tasks as worthwhile produces three distinct tactics: burden shuffling (when ill-equipped workers offload tasks they do not consider worthwhile), aspirational referrals (when ill-equipped workers seek better-equipped actors for tasks they view as worthwhile), and abandonment (when well-equipped workers disengage from tasks they deem unworthy and leave them to others). By disaggregating redistribution and tracing its relational conditions, this article shows how governance is enacted—and deferred—on the frontlines, and we offer a framework for understanding how workers navigate fragmentation and uneven responsibility in contemporary labor.
Keywords: frontline work; street-level bureaucracy; governance; redistribution; ambulance workers; mandated reporters; physicians (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224261454367 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:91:y:2026:i:4:p:651-673
DOI: 10.1177/00031224261454367
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in American Sociological Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().