EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Neutralist World and Disarmament Negotiations

Joseph L. Nogee
Additional contact information
Joseph L. Nogee: University of Houston

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1965, vol. 362, issue 1, 71-80

Abstract: The involvement of eight nonaligned nations in the Eighteen-Nation Disarmament Committee (ENDC) is the culmination of a growing neutralist influence in the United Na tions and a strong desire among the nonaligned nations to curb the arms race. Three years of negotiations in the Disarma ment Committee affords an opportunity to analyze the role of the neutralists on the Committee and their effect on the out come of the talks. The major neutralist efforts involved at tempting by various diplomatic techniques to pressure the nu clear powers into reconciling their differences. Although each of the eight reacted differently to various elements in United States-United Kingdom and Soviet Union proposals, they all avoided outward partisanship toward either East or West. A neutralist compromise proposal of April 1962, suggesting a sys tem of "inspection by invitation," failed to bridge the Soviet and American differences on the problem of inspection. While the neutralist presence at Geneva reduced the degree of po lemics in the talks and forced the nuclear powers—particularly the Soviets—to use more reasonable arguments, they did not substantially affect the outcome of the Committee's work. Both the "hot line" agreement and the partial-test-ban treaty in 1963 were negotiated by the nuclear powers on their own and without an audience.

Date: 1965
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626536200109 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:362:y:1965:i:1:p:71-80

DOI: 10.1177/000271626536200109

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications (sagediscovery@sagepub.com).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:362:y:1965:i:1:p:71-80