Two Critics in Search of a Bias: A Response to Currie and Skolnick

Neil J. Smelser
Additional contact information
Neil J. Smelser: University of California at Berkeley

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1970, vol. 391, issue 1, 46-55

Abstract: This essay is mainly a response to the foregoing one, in which Elliott Currie and Jerome Skolnick attempt to find an antidemocratic, irrationalist, "LeBonist" bias in my book, Theory of Collective Behavior. After noting some errors and misinterpretations in their essay, I attempt to dem onstrate that they take one of my several determinants and inflate it into an explanation, that they collapse several attributes that are analytically separate in my work, and that they turn my selection of determinants into simple value- preferences. The essay concludes with a general discussion of the issue of "discrediting" adherents to social movements by analyzing their ideologies in terms of determinants other than those contained in the ideologies themselves. I attempt to spell out my own position on these matters, and to locate some inconsistencies in Skolnick's approach to protest move ments in The Politics of Protest.

Date: 1970
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627039100105 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:391:y:1970:i:1:p:46-55

DOI: 10.1177/000271627039100105

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().