Social Scientists and the Riot Commission

Michael Lipsky

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1971, vol. 394, issue 1, 72-83

Abstract: This paper examines the temporal, political, conceptual, and methodological constraints encountered by social scientists working for the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (Kerner Commission). Focusing on efforts to develop a synthetic, theoretical explanation of the causes of disorders, to collect data on riot cities, and to adhere to accepted forms of social research, we discuss a fundamental tension between procedures preferred by social scientists and the demands of staff directors who must anticipate the ways in which commissioners will receive staff research. Under the circumstances, social scientists in some cases may conduct research on limited questions without significant interference in work schedules or modes of presentation. However, because of these constraints more often social scientists and their work serve to legitimate procedures and findings which are primarily developed without social science contributions.

Date: 1971
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627139400108 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:394:y:1971:i:1:p:72-83

DOI: 10.1177/000271627139400108

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().