Cost-Benefit Analysis of Health Service

Robert N. Grosse
Additional contact information
Robert N. Grosse: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1972, vol. 399, issue 1, 89-99

Abstract: "Where my health is concerned, cost is no ob ject." The reply of the penniless man to an expensive spe cialist reflects a moral question. Should the costs of health services be a significant consideration in deciding upon gov ernmental health policies and programs? The answer in my opinion is yes. Costs ought to be used in deciding the level of health activities versus other social goods and services, and in planning which health programs to support. The truly moral problem is not to distinguish between good and evil but rather to select appropriately among alternative goods. After argu ing that consideration of cost is a moral imperative, the useful ness of cost-benefit analysis in framing the right questions and in improving the chances of moving in directions of social improvement is urged, and some limitations are noted. Fi nally, examples of the use of cost-effectiveness analysis in studying problems of disease control and maternal and child health are given.

Date: 1972
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627239900111 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:399:y:1972:i:1:p:89-99

DOI: 10.1177/000271627239900111

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().