Complexities of Informed Consent

Bradford H. Gray
Additional contact information
Bradford H. Gray: Yale University

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1978, vol. 437, issue 1, 37-48

Abstract: Informed consent has emerged as an issue both of great importance and substantial uncertainty and confusion. This paper examines some of the conceptual and practical complexities of informed consent and suggests some impli cations of our empirical knowledge about consent. Among the issues considered are the purposes of informed consent, ethical versus legal functions of informed consent, the dis tinction between informed consent and consent forms, and whether informed consent is an ideal that can never be achieved. It is argued that informed consent is presently not a reliable method of protecting subjects and patients from harm because of limited commitment of professionals to the concept of informed consent, the tendency for procedures to be substituted for substance, the dependence of the quality of consent on many factors, including the characteristics of the subjects or patients, and the tendency of human subjects review committees to confine their attention to consent forms rather than to the process by which consent is sought.

Date: 1978
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627843700104 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:437:y:1978:i:1:p:37-48

DOI: 10.1177/000271627843700104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().