Quality, Cost, and Clinical Decisions

Avedis Donabedian

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1983, vol. 468, issue 1, 196-204

Abstract: Clinical decisions require determining the objectives of care as well as selecting and implementing a strategy of care. At the very least the optimal strategy balances the expected benefit and harm from technical interventions. Health care practitioners tend to specify optimal strategies based on what they consider to be best for patients, without regard to monetary cost. This is an absolutist definition of quality. Individuals may place different valuations on the outcomes, are concerned with the monetary costs to themselves, and are particularly sensitive to the attributes of the interpersonal relationship with the practitioners. Including all of these leads to an individualized definition of the quality of care. But this specification of quality may be in conflict with a social definition of quality, which takes into account social as well as individual monetary costs, externalities, and the social distribution of quality. The health care professions may respond to the conflict in several ways, which are described in this article as evasion, rejection and confrontation, anticipation, advocacy, active complicity, passive complicity, and ambiguous adaptations.

Date: 1983
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716283468001013 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:468:y:1983:i:1:p:196-204

DOI: 10.1177/0002716283468001013

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().