The Insanity Defense in England and Wales since 1843

Stephen White

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1985, vol. 477, issue 1, 43-57

Abstract: For defendants in the nineteenth century seeking refuge from the death penalty, the insanity defense was like a haven eagerly sought but with difficulty secured. For defendants now, no longer at risk of the death penalty and able to take advantage of statutory defenses akin to insanity, the defense has become like a reef fearfully avoided but easily struck. The transformation of the defense from shelter to snare is best understood when traced through the attempts of defendants to establish a defense of irresistible impulse due to mental disorder. At first, irresistible impulse was pleaded as insanity under the McNaughtan Rules. When this was no longer possible, defendants turned to the defense of involuntary conduct, a defense elaborated largely in response to the development of motoring. The courts' response to this tactic has breathed new life into the McNaughtan Rules, but legislation is required to remove resulting anomalies.

Date: 1985
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716285477001005 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:477:y:1985:i:1:p:43-57

DOI: 10.1177/0002716285477001005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().