The Insanity Defense: Problems and Prospects for Studying the Impact of Legal Reforms

Henry J. Steadman and Joseph P. Morrissey

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1986, vol. 484, issue 1, 115-126

Abstract: Cries for reform of insanity defense statutes are often associated with notorious cases involving heinous offenses. In fact, little research exists on the reforms sparked by such cases. Reforms initiated without data on their likely impacts may lead to illusory or unintended results. A strategy to assess such changes, and any other type of insanity defense reform, is articulated in this article. This approach is substantially different from the approaches of any published reports. It rests upon a multistate scope, a systemic focus, an assessment of impacts on the entire criminal process, and a longitudinal data base. Some of the impediments to implementing such research designs and ways by which they can be overcome are discussed.

Date: 1986
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716286484001009 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:484:y:1986:i:1:p:115-126

DOI: 10.1177/0002716286484001009

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().