Assessing Israel's Record on Human Rights

Rita J. Simon

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1989, vol. 506, issue 1, 115-128

Abstract: Using public opinion data, this article examines Israeli Jewish and Arab attitudes toward and support for various aspects of civil liberties, such as the right to express unpopular beliefs and to engage in acts of protest. It also contrasts public attitudes with the Israeli system of law and justice and with Israeli responses to the uprising in the occupied territories of the West Bank and Gaza. The public opinion data show Israelis to be similar to Americans in their attitudes toward many civil liberty issues. The data also show differences between Jewish and Arab responses in their satisfaction with the way democracy works in Israel. Current Israeli practices on the West Bank and in Gaza involving violations of human rights such as the destruction of Arab homes, sending writers and intellectuals into exile, and invoking censorship and curfews are juxtaposed with the public opinion data. The author concludes that due process, adherence to the rule of law, and tolerance for unpopular ideas are not usually honored when a society believes it must respond to external threats to its security.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716289506001011 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:506:y:1989:i:1:p:115-128

DOI: 10.1177/0002716289506001011

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().