Human Rights in the Reagan Era: Acceptance in Principle

Aryeh Neier

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1989, vol. 506, issue 1, 30-41

Abstract: Over eight years, the Reagan administration's policy on human rights shifted dramatically. At the outset, some in the administration repudiated promoting human rights internationally as a foreign policy goal of the United States; others argued that the United States should condemn abuses by hostile totalitarian governments but not by friendly authoritarian governments. By the time the Reagan administration left office, it accepted that promoting human rights was a major goal and that the United States should be evenhanded in condemning abuses. Despite the seeming headway, much remains to be done. The Reagan administration equated elections and democracy with human rights and failed to condemn abuses by ostensible democracies such as the Philippines and Guatemala; it promoted human rights in high-profile countries such as Chile while ignoring abuses in obscure countries such as Somalia; and it failed to condemn abuses by Communist governments, such as Yugoslavia and China, that had broken with the Soviet Union. In the Bush years, the task of the human rights movement is to secure implementation of principles that are now accepted.

Date: 1989
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716289506001004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:506:y:1989:i:1:p:30-41

DOI: 10.1177/0002716289506001004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().