Affirmative Action and Its Negative Repercussions

Wm. Bradford Reynolds

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1992, vol. 523, issue 1, 38-49

Abstract: Whether preferential treatment comes packaged as a quota, a goal-and-timetable, a set-aside, or affirmative action, the consequence is the same. Favoring certain individuals because of race, gender, religion, or national origin inescapably means that individuals not similarly endowed are disfavored for the most offensive of reasons. To pretend such action is affirmative—or that such discrimination is benign—mocks the valiant struggle for an equal opportunity society that has defined America's domestic agenda for the last four decades. The nation lost sight of this fundamental truth during the decade of the 1970s and permitted governments to fashion affirmative action policies that made race, gender, and nationality the final arbiter of employment, student admissions, and contract decisions. It took a series of Supreme Court rulings in the late 1980s to right that wrong and restore the equality ideal that the Court had earlier resurrected in Brown v. Board of Education.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716292523001005 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:523:y:1992:i:1:p:38-49

DOI: 10.1177/0002716292523001005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().