A Free Trade Area with Mexico: Will U.S. Workers Lose?

Alan L. Madian

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1993, vol. 526, issue 1, 81-91

Abstract: The United States is immediately facing decisions on extending the current free trade area with Canada to Mexico and quite possibly to other Latin American countries. This article attempts to assess the economic basis, if any, for the objections that organized labor has raised to a free trade area with Mexico and other countries in the hemisphere. It is intended as a challenge to economists who support labor's position. Economic analyses undertaken to date conclude that a North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) is in labor's interest generally, although not necessarily in the interests of workers in some import-sensitive industries. Labor's proponents are unconvinced, but they have failed to provide theoretical or empirical analyses that support their position. While a variety of scenarios have been considered by economists analyzing a NAFTA, the consensus on employment impact converges on an estimate of a net increase of more than 60,000 U.S. jobs. Most studies also estimate small positive impacts on U.S. total wages and substantially expanded Mexican employment.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716293526001007 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:526:y:1993:i:1:p:81-91

DOI: 10.1177/0002716293526001007

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().