The Risk Management Dilemma

Richard Zeckhauser and W Viscusi

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996, vol. 545, issue 1, 144-155

Abstract: Market processes play a central and constructive role in allocating risks, but impediments such as inaccurately perceived risks and externalities create a potential role for government intervention. Individuals overestimate small risks, are averse to imprecisely understood risks, and give excessive weight to errors of commission over errors of omission. The challenge for the government is to strike an appropriate balance in its risk regulation efforts and to avoid institutionalizing common irrational responses to risk. Excessive expenditures on risk reduction, often undertaken by or required by government, not only squander resources but also may increase risks to us all; they can divert expenditures that could have been used to enhance our standard of living and, directly or indirectly, our health. Risk equity concerns often prove problematic: they may direct excessive attention to unimportant risks and hinder efforts to deploy resources to produce the greatest gains in societal health status.

Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716296545001015 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:545:y:1996:i:1:p:144-155

DOI: 10.1177/0002716296545001015

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().