What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter?

Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Michael G. Hagen, Dan Orr, Lesley Sillaman, Suzanne Morse and Kim Kirn
Additional contact information
Kathleen Hall Jamieson: Annenberg School for Communication and director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2000, vol. 572, issue 1, 12-16

Abstract: The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271620057200103 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:572:y:2000:i:1:p:12-16

DOI: 10.1177/000271620057200103

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().