EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Public Opinion and the Governance of Punishment in Democratic Political Systems

Franklin E. Zimring and David T. Johnson
Additional contact information
Franklin E. Zimring: Criminal Justice Research Program at the University of California, Berkeley
David T. Johnson: University of Hawaii

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2006, vol. 605, issue 1, 265-280

Abstract: It is unlikely that hostile attitudes about criminals or beliefs that punishments for crime were too lenient were the major causes of the explosive increase in punishments in the United States after 1970. Public hostility toward criminals has been a consistent theme in this country for a long time, but it did not cause big increases in imprisonment before 1970 in the United States or large expansions of incarceration elsewhere. In this article, the authors argue that growth in the salience of crime as a citizen concern and increasing public distrust of government competence and legitimacy were two of a number of changes that transformed ever-present hostile attitudes into a dynamic force in American politics. Negative attitudes toward offenders are a necessary condition for anticrime crusades, but they are always present. It was the addition of fear and distrust into the law and politics of punishment setting that produced the perfect storm of punitive expansion.

Keywords: punishment; democracy; public attitudes; leniency; severity; salience; discretion; trust in government (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716205285949 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:605:y:2006:i:1:p:265-280

DOI: 10.1177/0002716205285949

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:605:y:2006:i:1:p:265-280