Balancing Ambition and Gender Among Decision Makers

Christopher W. Larimer, Rebecca J. Hannagan and Kevin B. Smith
Additional contact information
Christopher W. Larimer: University of Northern Iowa
Rebecca J. Hannagan: Northern Illinois University
Kevin B. Smith: University of Nebraska-Lincoln

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2007, vol. 614, issue 1, 56-73

Abstract: In this article, we use an original laboratory experiment to test how people react to ambitious decision makers, allowing for interactions with gender. In the experiment, participants are told two decision makers will be dividing some valuable resource on their behalf. One decision maker (either high or low in ambition) is “appointed.†Participants vote from a slate of candidates, about whom they have information on gender and ambition, for the second decision maker. We find that people tend to associate high ambition with male and self-interested behavior and that the selection of the second decision maker depends on the level of ambition of the first decision maker as well as perceptions of gender of that decision maker. We conclude by suggesting important implications for research on vote choice and representation.

Keywords: ambition; gender; big man; representation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716207305272 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:614:y:2007:i:1:p:56-73

DOI: 10.1177/0002716207305272

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().