Parable of Two Agencies, One of Which Randomizes

Dominic Pearson, David Torgerson, Cynthia McDougall and Roger Bowles
Additional contact information
Dominic Pearson: National Probation Service in County Durham
David Torgerson: York Trials Unit
Cynthia McDougall: University of York
Roger Bowles: University of York, UK

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2010, vol. 628, issue 1, 11-29

Abstract: This article examines the design of evaluations in settings where there is a choice as to how an intervention is to be introduced and evaluated. It uses data from a supervision program for offenders on probation in the UK (Bruce and Hollin forthcoming) that had been indicated by a pilot evaluation in one probation area to merit wider-scale implementation and evaluation. For the remaining two probation areas in the region, a randomized controlled allocation of participants to conditions was recommended. One of the areas adopted a stepped wedge design, in which probation offices were randomly allocated sequentially to the program. The second area opted to launch the program across the whole area simultaneously, with a retrospective sample as control group. The article compares the results of implementation in each probation area and seeks to draw wider inferences about the management of program implementation and the randomized controlled designs appropriate for similar field studies.

Keywords: program implementation; randomized controlled trial; field study; community corrections; offender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716209351500 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:628:y:2010:i:1:p:11-29

DOI: 10.1177/0002716209351500

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().