EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reporting Methodological Items in Randomized Experiments in Political Science

Isabelle Boutron, Peter John and David J. Torgerson
Additional contact information
Isabelle Boutron: CONSORT Statements for nonpharmacological treatments
Peter John: Institute for Political and Economic Governance (IPEG) in the School of Social Sciences at the University of Manchester, UK
David J. Torgerson: York Trials Unit

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2010, vol. 628, issue 1, 112-131

Abstract: This article discusses the arguments for using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) procedures in political science field experiments, with the aim of improving the clarity and transparency of research work and reducing the possibility of bias. The article reviews the background to CONSORT, which is increasingly required for carrying out and reporting trials in healthcare and other disciplines. It sets out the main elements of the scheme and then applies its criteria to evaluate a published Get Out the Vote (GOTV) study by John and Brannan (2008). The CONSORT checklist shows the methods in this article to be clear and transparent but that CONSORT could improve the reporting of turnout experiments, such as details of the numbers going through the trial at each stage. The article argues that applying CONSORT to reports of trials in political science journals is a feasible and desirable objective.

Keywords: trials; field experiments; CONSORT; voter turnout (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716209351518 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:628:y:2010:i:1:p:112-131

DOI: 10.1177/0002716209351518

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:628:y:2010:i:1:p:112-131