Populism and Late Liberalism

Jean Comroff

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2011, vol. 637, issue 1, 99-111

Abstract: “Populism,†a key trope of our times, is sometimes a term of analysis and critique, but more often a label of disparagement and blame. While many activists claim to be “ of the people†or “ for the people,†most would think twice about dubbing themselves “populist†as such. Yet it is precisely the slipperiness of the term that makes it so productive in political rhetoric. Why the increasing appeal of the trope? Given its widespread, contentious deployment, can it retain any usefulness as a tool of analysis—even critical engagement? Drawing on a range of current examples, the author argues (1) that populism in some form is a necessary condition of all antiestablishment movements, progressive or conservative; (2) that it is in itself never enough to fuel sustained, politically constructive mobilization; and (3) that in all these respects, populism seems to be taking on particular, disquieting features in late modern times.

Keywords: liberalism; politics; populism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716211406079 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:637:y:2011:i:1:p:99-111

DOI: 10.1177/0002716211406079

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().