Can Administrative Records Be Used to Reduce Nonresponse Bias?

John L. Czajka

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2013, vol. 645, issue 1, 171-184

Abstract: One option for addressing the bias that may result from survey nonresponse is to make greater use of the administrative records that federal and state agencies compile. Such records have been used to assess response bias but less often to correct for such error. Direct substitution of administrative records for survey data, as is done for income data in Canada, provides a means of compensating for survey nonresponse; but the limitations of such data must be recognized. Administrative records may not cover the entire population of interest, may utilize a different unit of observation, may have wide variation in data quality across items or by agency, and may have timeliness issues. In using administrative records, researchers cede control over the content of individual variables, which may differ from survey concepts and be subject to change. Furthermore, privacy protections embodied in law restrict the use of many types of administrative records.

Keywords: coverage; data quality; Numident; tax returns; timeliness; underreporting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716212463313 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:645:y:2013:i:1:p:171-184

DOI: 10.1177/0002716212463313

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().