Medicare Expansion as a Path as well as a Destination: Achieving Universal Insurance through a New Politics of Medicare

Jacob S. Hacker

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2019, vol. 685, issue 1, 135-153

Abstract: Growing interest in “Medicare for All†has revived hopes for universal health insurance. Yet serious disagreements remain over how to expand Medicare and how far to move toward a universal Medicare system. In this article, I consider these disagreements in light of what we know about “policy feedback†—the ways in which policies, once enacted, reshape public opinion, governing institutions, and political organizations. Rather than focusing on the “political feasibility†of proposals for Medicare expansion, I focus on their “policy sustainability†: whether proposals, once enacted, can be established in place, entrenched over time, and expanded and improved as circumstances change. Achieving these “three E’s,†I argue, requires a flexible approach that builds on the current system (and hence falls short of Medicare for All) but also contains a universal coverage guarantee and other provisions designed to create strong feedback effects conducive to the expansion of Medicare over time.

Keywords: health care; health insurance; Medicare; policy feedback; American politics; Affordable Care Act (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219871017 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:685:y:2019:i:1:p:135-153

DOI: 10.1177/0002716219871017

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().