Implementing the Expanded Child Tax Credit: What Worked, What Didn’t, and How to Move Forward

Pamela Herd and Donald Moynihan

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2023, vol. 710, issue 1, 58-74

Abstract: The Child Tax Credit (CTC) expansion was an extraordinary experiment not just in policy design but also in policy implementation. As such, it cast light on the possibilities and blind spots of using the tax system to deliver safety-net benefits. The rapid and widespread take-up of the benefit reflected the use of a specific implementation tool that reduced administrative burden for the public: auto-enrollment via the tax system. But use of this tool also excluded families who could benefit from the program but were disconnected from the tax system. These tended to be families with the lowest incomes. Thus, while the CTC expansion offered a classic example of “targeting within universalism†by broadening a policy’s beneficiaries while making it more redistributive, its implementation revealed that a different sort of targeting is needed to reach those with the lowest incomes and to achieve the hoped-for redistributive impact.

Keywords: administrative burden; inequality; Child Tax Credit; poverty; tax system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162241261177 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:anname:v:710:y:2023:i:1:p:58-74

DOI: 10.1177/00027162241261177

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().