The Reliability and Practicality of the Arkansas Method Assay of Isoniazid Adherence

Katharine E. Schmitz, Melbourne F. Hovell, Charlene A. Wong, Norma J. Kelley, Donata Nilsen, Elaine J. Blumberg, Linda L. Hill, Carol L. Sipan, Bo Kolody and Dale A. Chatfield
Additional contact information
Katharine E. Schmitz: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA, kschmitz@projects.sdsu.edu
Melbourne F. Hovell: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Charlene A. Wong: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Norma J. Kelley: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Donata Nilsen: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Elaine J. Blumberg: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Linda L. Hill: University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
Carol L. Sipan: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Bo Kolody: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Dale A. Chatfield: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

Clinical Nursing Research, 2010, vol. 19, issue 2, 131-143

Abstract: The Arkansas method (AM) for isoniazid (INH) metabolite detection is a relatively inexpensive, simple, objective measure of adherence. The purpose of the study was to explore whether variations in urine sample handling and storage will produce accurate assay outcomes. Participants were a convenience sample of 28 adults and adolescents prescribed INH for latent tuberculosis infection. Participants provided one sample to test effects of the following: mixing processes; durations at room temperature, in a refrigerator, or frozen; and effects of freeze/thaw cycles on AM outcomes. No manipulations had a discernible impact on outcomes with concordant positive rates from 85% to 100%. Concordance rates of manipulated samples did not appear to differ from rates of norm samples. Results suggest that urine samples can withstand a variety of manipulations in both handling and storage without affecting the accuracy of AM assay results. These findings have important implications for providers of treatment and researchers and provide the impetus for both to examine the potential of using the AM of INH metabolite testing as a measure of medication adherence.

Keywords: Arkansas method; tuberculosis; LTBI; adherence; isoniazid (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773810363473 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:clnure:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:131-143

DOI: 10.1177/1054773810363473

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Clinical Nursing Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().