Arrhythmia Perception and Quality of Life in Bradyarrhythmia Patients Following Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Shu-Fen Su and
Meng-Shan Wu
Clinical Nursing Research, 2021, vol. 30, issue 2, 183-192
Abstract:
Although studies have evaluated the quality of life (QoL) of patients undergoing permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement, their results are inconsistent. To assess arrhythmia perceptions and QoL in bradyarrhythmia patients following PPM implantation, 137 patients completed demographic, arrhythmia perception, and QoL questionnaires before and six months after implantation. Before implantation, they reported fatigue (74.1%), dizziness (72.9%), dyspnea (64.7%), chest pain (62.4%), and heart fluttering (54.1%). After implantation, arrhythmia perceptions and QoL showed significant improvement ( p .05). However, patients with arrhythmia for more than three years, three or more PPM implants, two or more comorbidities, or were 41-50 years showed no significant QoL improvement. Doctors and hospital educators, rather than nurses, provided the most PPM information to patients. Since nurses provide primary in-hospital care to PPM patients, they should impart more patient education while considering individual characteristics in caring situations to enhance patients’ QoL.
Keywords: permanent pacemaker; arrhythmia perceptions; quality of life; bradyarrhythmia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773819880297 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:183-192
DOI: 10.1177/1054773819880297
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Clinical Nursing Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().