EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Strike-through Contamination in Saturated Sterile Dressings

Deborah M. Popovich, Doris Alexander, Maude Rittman, Christopher Martorella and Letitia Jackson
Additional contact information
Deborah M. Popovich: University of Florida
Doris Alexander: University of Florida
Maude Rittman: Veteran's Administration Medical Center
Christopher Martorella: Alachua General Hospital
Letitia Jackson: North Florida Regional Medical Center

Clinical Nursing Research, 1995, vol. 4, issue 2, 195-207

Abstract: This multisite study examined the risk of strike-through contamination of 4" x 4" gauze sponges using a shortcut method of saturating sterile sponges directly on their wrappers. Sterile gauze sponges were saturated directly on their wrappers on hospital over-bed tables of postoperative general surgical patients. Cultures were taken at 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 minutes after saturation to ascertain whether strike-through contamination occurred Saturated sponges showed significant microorganism growth when compared to expected zero microorganisms at all sampling times following saturation Although microorganisms identified in strike-through contamination were not microbiologically orpathogenically threatening, the basic principle of asepsis was violated There was no significant difference in strike-through contamination between sponges saturated on coated wrappers and sponges saturated on uncoated wrappers. Clinicians should be aware that coated wrappers do not provide a moisture-proof barrier against strike-through contamination. The findings suggest the shortcut method should not be used for saturating sponges.

Date: 1995
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389500400206 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:2:p:195-207

DOI: 10.1177/105477389500400206

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Clinical Nursing Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:2:p:195-207