Growth, Stability, and the Urban Portfolio

William Spelman
Additional contact information
William Spelman: University of Texas at Austin

Economic Development Quarterly, 2006, vol. 20, issue 4, 299-316

Abstract: Local governments provide infrastructure improvements, guarantee loans, and offer tax incentives to lure new businesses and keep old ones. This is usually done with one objective in mind—maximizing economic growth. Application of investment portfolio theory to historic data on metropolitan growth rates suggests that there are clear costs to this strategy in the form of increased volatility in growth rates. In addition, most cities are economically inefficient in the sense that the volatility in growth rates is greater than it would be if their economies were better diversified. The extent of this inefficiency, referred to here as avoidable risk, is an effective performance measure for local economic development activities. Local officials should consider this measure and the objective of diversification when making economic development decisions.

Keywords: portfolio theory; incentives; risk; performance measures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242406291491 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:20:y:2006:i:4:p:299-316

DOI: 10.1177/0891242406291491

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().