EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Transitional Cluster Development: A Case Study From the New York Wine Industry

Arthur L. Centonze
Additional contact information
Arthur L. Centonze: Pace University, New York, NY, USA, acentonze@pace.edu

Economic Development Quarterly, 2010, vol. 24, issue 3, 251-260

Abstract: A number of economic development studies have examined established wine industries around the world using Porter’s cluster model. This article uses Porter’s cluster model to study the strengths and weaknesses of the Hudson River Valley wine region as it transitions from an agricultural cluster to a wine cluster. The study seeks to determine what the cluster model can contribute to our understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the Hudson Valley wine cluster, and what the prospects are for its future development as an export-based wine region rather than an agritourism region. The nature of this transformation is explored as well as the challenges to the cluster’s future development and competitive performance. Some of the major policy implications of the case are discussed in light of the literature and specific development needs of a transitioning cluster.

Keywords: wine industry; transitional cluster; New York; cluster development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242410362897 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:24:y:2010:i:3:p:251-260

DOI: 10.1177/0891242410362897

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:24:y:2010:i:3:p:251-260