Holding Their Feet to the Fire

Elaine B. Sharp and Kevin Mullinix

Economic Development Quarterly, 2012, vol. 26, issue 2, 138-150

Abstract: This article focuses on four policies that a number of cities are using to make businesses more accountable for the development subsidies that they receive (cost–benefit analysis, effectiveness measurement, performance agreements, and clawback clauses). Using data from International City Management Association’s 2009 Economic Development Survey supplemented with Census Bureau data, three explanations for variation in city governments’ adoption of these policies are tested: economic need, governmental capacity, and political context. The results reveal very limited support for economic need–type explanations while strongly underscoring the importance of governmental capacity. Further, stark contrast with existing work on the topic, political context is shown to be important in multiple respects: The existence of lower class opportunity regimes and citizen opposition are both strongly linked with the use of at least two of these accountability policies, but this is conditioned by the city’s form of government.

Keywords: benefit/cost studies; economic development incentives/tools; state and local economic development policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242411431959 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:26:y:2012:i:2:p:138-150

DOI: 10.1177/0891242411431959

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().