Did the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Cause Subsidized Worker Substitution?
Economic Development Quarterly, 2012, vol. 26, issue 3, 231-237
This article questions whether the implementation of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) created an incentive for employers to substitute subsidized workers for incumbent workers. To see if this substitution occurs, the author uses a differences-in-differences methodology to test whether the implementation of the WOTC caused both an increase in employment from a representative target group and a decrease in employment of a group that is a close substitute for members of the target group. The author finds no evidence that subsidized worker substitution occurred in the period after the WOTC was implemented. There is evidence that the WOTC is effective in increasing the employment rates of long-term welfare recipients.
Keywords: Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC); subsidized worker substitution; differences-in-differences; welfare reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:26:y:2012:i:3:p:231-237
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().