Can Industrial R&D Survive the Decline of Production Activity: A Case Study of the Chicago Area

Alenka S. Giese and William Testa
Additional contact information
Alenka S. Giese: Federal Reserve Bank

Economic Development Quarterly, 1988, vol. 2, issue 4, 326-338

Abstract: By distinguishing industrial R&D from manufacturing production, this study identifies a local economy's comparative advantage by activity rather than by product. The Chicago area's comparative advantage has shifted away from production and toward R&D activity during the 1976 to 1985 period. Underlying the Chicago area's overall manufacturing decline, those Chicago area R&D activities associated with its mainstay industries have survived and grown. The product cycle paradigm provides a behavioral framework with which to interpret the underlying revival in R&D activity. Production activities have moved away in search of low-cost environments while attendant R&D facilities have continued to display an attraction for Chicago's urban resources. So too, Chicago's past development has left a legacy of technological infrastructure, which some outside industries have found attractive in locating their R&D facilities.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124248800200406 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:2:y:1988:i:4:p:326-338

DOI: 10.1177/089124248800200406

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().