EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

States Take the Lead in Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives

Chaaron Pearson, Alison Wakefield, Logan Timmerhoff, Elizabeth Gray and Jeff Chapman

Economic Development Quarterly, 2025, vol. 39, issue 4, 261-266

Abstract: Each year, states collectively spend tens of billions of dollars on tax incentive programs. Despite being states’ largest investment in economic development, research from The Pew Charitable Trusts found in 2012 that no state regularly and rigorously evaluated the effectiveness of incentives. This left policy makers with very little information to guide decision making. Since 2012, there has been a sea change: More than two-thirds of states and several major cities now regularly produce high quality evaluations of their major incentives, using rigorous and creative methods to measure impact. Pew's research both informed and followed this shift in the field. In addition to assessing the effects of incentives, these evaluations also provide a wealth of valuable information on how to design more effective incentives. As a result, policy makers are better informed and capitalize on the new information as they launch, continue, modify, or repeal programs.

Keywords: economic development incentives; cost-benefit; economic impact; economic development policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251378378 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:261-266

DOI: 10.1177/08912424251378378

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-18
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:261-266