Regional versus Industrial Shift-Share Analysis—With Help from the Lotus Spreadsheet
R. Bradley Hoppes
Additional contact information
R. Bradley Hoppes: Southwest Missouri State University
Economic Development Quarterly, 1991, vol. 5, issue 3, 258-267
Abstract:
The predominant use of shift-share analysis has been to analyze regional changes in employment over a given time period. This article focuses on how shift-share should, rather than should not, be used. In particular, the focus is the analysis and economic interpretation of shift-share results at the industry level. We attempt to codify some of the more recent shift-share modifications and mesh them with the earlier suggestions of Dunn. There is a brief review of the popular conventional shift-share model, noting it does not provide meaningful industry-level results due to the assumption of proportionality. A shift-share model whose industry- and region-level interpretations are consistent is illustrated. The modified version also resolves, somewhat at least the structural weighting dilemma of the conventional model. Furthermore, we believe this model, in conjunction with the Barif-Knight dynamic approach, provides more robust shift-share results by enriching the economic interpretation of industry results. Finally, given our pedagogical thrust, we provide the shift-share formulae for the two models in a Lotus spreadsheet format.
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249100500306 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:5:y:1991:i:3:p:258-267
DOI: 10.1177/089124249100500306
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().