The Effect of Labor Cost Differences on the Location of Economic Activity under the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement

Karen Roberts and Phillip R. Smith
Additional contact information
Karen Roberts: Michigan State University
Phillip R. Smith: Michigan State University

Economic Development Quarterly, 1992, vol. 6, issue 1, 52-63

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to compare compensation costs for Canadian and U.S. workers to evaluate how relative compensation costs may affect firm location decisions with the implementation of the Free Trade Agreement. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Labour Division of Statistics Canada, the major findings were that compensation costs for U.S. labor were consistently higher than for Canadian labor; and, that despite apparent Canadian preferences for social insurance, U.S. nonwage compensation was also higher. Higher U.S. costs persisted after allowing for large shifts in the exchange rate except in retail trade. When differences in labor productivity were incorporated, the Canadian cost advantage disappeared except in wholesale trade. Major conclusions were that cost differences will motivate firms to locate distribution centers on the Canadian side of the border; and, that socialization of medical costs in Canada will increase pressure for restructuring financing of health insurance in the United States.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249200600105 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:6:y:1992:i:1:p:52-63

DOI: 10.1177/089124249200600105

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development Quarterly
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().