Marketisation and the dual welfare state: Neoliberalism and inequality in Australia
Ben Spies-Butcher
The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2014, vol. 25, issue 2, 185-201
Abstract:
Australian social policy has seen apparently contradictory developments over the period of economic restructuring. Social spending has increased based on a highly redistributive model while inequality has grown. This article explores the relationship between Australia’s experience of economic restructuring and the political dynamics of an emerging ‘dual welfare state’. Importantly, the article argues that Australian reformers did not reject the state per se, nor egalitarianism as an objective. Instead, reform sought to combine greater competition with compensation, generating larger inequalities in market incomes alongside growing social spending. The article explores how Labor combined neoclassical ideas about competition with a commitment to a ‘small state’ version of social democracy. This did moderate inequalities through the period of restructuring, but it also altered the dynamics of political contestation. The article provides two typologies to understand this political dynamic, arguing forms of marketisation opened the door to a political contest over the nature, rather than the extent, of public provision, while the model of targeting reinforced paternalist tendencies inherent in neoliberal reform.
Keywords: Income distribution; markets and marketisation; means testing; neoliberalism; social policy; welfare state (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D47 H53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304614530076 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:185-201
DOI: 10.1177/1035304614530076
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().